Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in comments
Search in excerpt
Search in posts
Search in pages
Search in groups
Search in users
Search in forums
Filter by Categories
Academic Practice
Academic Writing Month
Academic Writing Month
AcWri
AcWriMo
Blogging and Social Media
Book Editing
Book Literature Review
Book Marketing and Impact
Book Planning
Book Proposals
Book Publishing
Book Writing
Books
Citations and Referencing
Collaboration
Community
Conference Paper Abstracts
Conference Paper Editing
Conference Paper Literature Review
Conference Paper Marketing and Impact
Conference Paper Planning
Conference Paper Presenting
Conference Paper Writing
Conference Papers
Digital Publishing
Experimental Digital Publishing
Grant Abstracts
Grant Completion Reporting
Grant Impact Statement
Grant Literature Review
Grant Methods Section
Grant Writing
Grants
Journal Article Abstracts
Journal Article Editing
Journal Article Literature Review
Journal Article Marketing and Impact
Journal Article Peer Review
Journal Article Planning
Journal Article Writing
Journal Articles
Networking
News
Open Access
Productivity
Reading and Note-Taking
Reseach Project Planning
Resources
Tools
Uncategorized
Website
The BubbleCow Guide to Academic Book Pitching: Part VI

Sadly this is the last instalment of BubbleCow’s guide to writing a great academic book proposal.

Sniff, sniff!

Now, we’ve looked at pitching and writing, but what about the essential review process which forms a large part of getting your academic book in print? Well, of course, the fact is, this won’t happen until after you’ve hooked the editor with your dazzling query letter, proposal and sample chapters, but is there anything you can do at the start to help with this process?

Sure there is! 

It’s highly likely that as part of your pitch, you’ll be invited to propose a selection of peer reviewers. This can be a delicate balance to strike. By all means suggest your PhD supervisor, but be prepared for the editor to reject this choice on the basis that he or she might recognise your work and or automatically give you a positive review. With that in mind, think of people who will be sympathetic to your proposed project. For example, might your book appear to give theirs added prestige or increase its sales as a companion text?  Are they themselves fighting tooth and nail to get a particular field adequate recognition and would your book support the fight? Even, are their books they’ve publicly criticised that your book will be in direct competition with? It’s also worth choosing academics who are not so world-famous that they might delay the review process due to other commitments.

Much cleverer than all that though, is picking one or two reviewers who you know the editor knows. For example, you’ve likely chosen to pitch to a press with form in your particular area, and it’s also likely that one of the books on your list of comparables is one of theirs too, so now list that author as a reviewer. If the editor has already published their work, then you can bank on the fact they value his or her opinion, so now show them how that (valued opinion) relates to your work!

I hope this 6-part journey through academic book pitching has been useful, and that you’ll keep up with other BubbleCow channels of advice such as our blog and twitter feed, but before I sign off I’d like to show you a couple of other ways in which we at BubbleCow can help you make a successful book pitch

Synopsis Clinic.

BubbleCow’s Synopsis Clinic is a fast and cost effective service designed to give writers immediate and practical feedback on their synopsis and cover letter. In essence this means that you submit your query letter and synopsis and I will guarantee to personally provide detailed feedback. This offer of my personal feedback is open ONLY to those who have read this 6-part guide.

The cost of detailed feedback for your query letter and synopsis is £50/$85/€ 56.

To receive this immediate and practical feedback on your synopsis and cover letter click here now.

Submission Package.

BubbleCow’s Submission Package offers the same great service as the Synopsis Clinic (a personal edit by me of your query letter and synopsis) PLUS a detailed line-by-line edit, and reader’s report, of your sample chapters carried out by one of our professional copy editors.

The cost of this detailed feedback of your query letter by me and synopsis plus detailed copy edit of your extract is £125/$210/€ 140.

To have your work professionally edited by me and one of our editors, click here now.

Last but by no means least, I’d like to wish you lots of luck getting your first academic book in print!


Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What is 7 + 8 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)